Four strategies for mitigating supply chain risks

Proven strategies for procurement professionals to strengthen supply chains and navigate uncertainty

Want to learn more about how to mitigate risks in supply chain management? Download our strategic risk guide today. Having access to actionable strategies and expert insights is critical for building resilience and safeguarding profitability. You can learn more in the full report.

Strategy one: Supplier diversification 

The problem: Over-reliance on single suppliers increases vulnerability to disruptions.  

Solution: Implement comprehensive supplier diversification strategies that include: 

  • Geographic diversification to reduce concentration risk to specific regions 
  • Multi-tier supplier mapping to understand dependencies throughout the supply chain 
  • Balanced supplier portfolios where no single supplier represents more than 30-40% of business 

Pro tip: Audit existing suppliers and categorize risks based on market dependence and geopolitical volatility. The optimal supplier mix depends on factors including the importance of the purchased item, switching costs and expected order variability. 

Strategy two: Scenario-based planning 

The problem: Static annual procurement budgets lack agility to adapt to dynamic risks like tariffs hikes or material shortages.  

Solution: Develop dynamic scenario-based planning capabilities that include: 

  • Multiple scenario modelling covering optimistic, pessimistic and best-guess outcomes 
  • Real-time trigger mechanisms that activate predetermined response strategies 
  • Agile budget allocation that can adapt to changing market conditions 

Pro tip: Implement contracting mechanisms with tariff-specific clauses and flexibility provisions.  

Strategy three: Dynamic should-cost modelling 

Traditional cost evaluations conducted annually or quarterly are insufficient for today’s volatile markets. Dynamic should-cost modelling helps you react faster to price changes by analyzing costs in real-time.  

Benefits: 

  • Swift reaction capability to raw material price shifts 
  • Enhanced collaboration between procurement and finance teams 
  • Improved negotiation position through transparent cost structure understanding 

Strategy four: Adapting to tariff volatility 

The problem: Blanket tariffs on raw materials and fluctuating rates disrupt financial forecasts and supplier relationships. The current tariff environment has created uncertainty that makes traditional procurement planning obsolete.  

Solution: Develop comprehensive tariff management strategies: 

  • Cost-sharing contract mechanisms that distribute tariff impact between buyers and suppliers 
  • Predictive tariff modelling using market intelligence to anticipate policy changes 
  • Flexible procurement cycles that can adapt to rapid tariff adjustments 

Pro tip: Build supplier relationships that foster flexibility and collaboration during tariff volatility periods. Companies that proactively engage with suppliers on tariff management will likely have better outcomes than those taking purely reactive approaches.  

Want to learn more about how to mitigate risks in supply chain management? Download our strategic risk guide today. Having access to actionable strategies and expert insights is critical for building resilience and safeguarding profitability. You can learn more in the full report.

What to read next
The global tungsten market in 2026 is marked by extreme volatility driven by geopolitical tensions, trade disputes, and resource nationalism, especially between China and the US. These dynamics have caused significant supply disruptions and price surges across tungsten products.
In the past year, trade policy has and continues to fuel change and dynamics in the North American steel market. Meanwhile, inflation has remained at or above 2.7% while the Fed Fund rate hovers around 2.64. The consumer continues to bear a growing burden to keep the economy from stalling, as finished goods markets search for their own nadir, stability and potential growth paths.
The recent wave of anti-dumping measures approved in Brazil has been met with some concern in China — the country most affected by the Brazilian government’s decisions in this case — but despite the negative impact, Chinese participants see the moves as just another phase of doing business.
The Canadian government’s recent efforts to curb unfair steel imports and protectionist measures for its domestic steel industry are “not enough,” and Canada needs to do “exactly what the US is doing,” the executive chairman and chief executive officer of Zekelman Industries, Barry Zekelman, told Fastmarkets in an exclusive interview on Wednesday February 11.
Discover how fear, deglobalization and AI are transforming the copper market. Insights from the Fast Forward podcast's interview with David Lilley of Drakewood Capital.
The US and Canadian steel industries are “aligned” in trade policies, and the imposition of Section 232 tariffs against Canada is “unjustified,” Canadian Steel Producers Association (CSPA) vice president for trade and industry affairs Francois Desmarais told Fastmarkets in an exclusive interview on Friday February 6.