Soybean crush margins: What is driving volatility

A data analysis

Argentinian soybean production has fallen over the last two years, and this is mainly due to the impact of La Niña, a climate event that heavily reduced South American yields and upset growth in US production for the 2020-21 season.

Monthly data for Argentinian crushing volumes indicate that crush slowed by about five percent in the first quarter of the 2022-23 marketing year and dropped by ten percent relative to last year in July. The previous year’s below-trendline yields reduced production and supplies available to Argentine crushers, and slow farmer sales contributed to the slowdown in crushing volumes.

As a result, Argentinian soy meal exports have been negatively affected.

According to Fastmarkets, soybean crush volumes are following the same trend in the EU and losing pace.

The impact on Chinese soybean crush industry

The decline in world production has slowed world soybean crushing outside the US, as limited sales by Argentine farmers are pushing product prices up.

China, one of the largest soybean importers, has been reducing its crush volumes and will likely reduce imports due to non-attractive profit margins.

Chinese crush margins have been at the lower end of the historical range, dropping below zero for much of the summer and just getting back to break even in mid-September.

Soaring soybean prices drive weaker crush margins

The high price of soybeans has been the main driver of weak crush margins, so a recovery in South American production could help lift margins in the spring.

However, the increased demand for soybeans from US crushers could limit importable supplies, upsetting the potential for further improvement in Chinese margins through the end of the year.

We provide market outlooks, price data, forecasts and analysis of trends.

Speak to our sales team to explore our platform and pricing tools for your commodity.

What to read next
In the latest short episode of Fast Forward, Fastmarkets grain market reporter Masha Belikova explores the key forces shaping wheat pricing across the Black Sea region and why prices have remained unexpectedly firm despite strong crop expectations.
The US Department of Energy’s release of an updated model under the revised 45Z Clean Fuel Production Credit framework for Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Technologies (45ZCF-GREET) on Friday June 12 provides additional clarity on how feedstock economics could evolve, improving the outlook for soybean oil and canola while largely preserving the competitiveness of waste-based feedstocks such as used cooking oil (UCO), tallow and distillers corn oil (DCO).
US wheat futures and Euronext contracts were mixed on Tuesday June 16, with most US contracts moving lower, while Chicago soft red winter wheat futures posted gains. Euronext contracts also moved higher during the session. Global cash markets remained subdued, with limited activity as buyers largely stayed on the sidelines. Black Sea wheat prices are starting to trend lower under seasonal harvest pressure, while Australia, Europe and Argentina were broadly steady.
Soybean and soybean meal futures continued to ride on the coattails of the bullish National Oilseed Processors Association (NOPA) crush report on Tuesday June 16, with market chatter that China is bidding on — or indeed may have already bought — US beans for February, giving much-lauded impetus to further increases in futures markets over the period.
Soybean oil bases in Argentina and Brazil hit a record spread to their counterpart in the US Gulf on June 1, with a mix of biofuel policies, harvest pressures and export competition against rival oils creating massive regional divergences, although the spread decreased by the end of last week amid a CME soyoil futures sell-off.
EU wheat exports reached 19.23 million tonnes as of May 31, according to European Commission data, yet weekly flow data from Rouen port collapsed 66.6% to 72,923 tonnes in the week to June 3, pointing to a sharp deceleration in physical trade.