West needs clear policies, China cooperation for lithium success

The US and Europe must adopt long-term, consistent policies and should learn lessons from China, according to lithium industry experts speaking at Fastmarkets’ Lithium Supply and Battery Raw Materials Conference in Las Vegas, US, over June 22-25

China’s initial push to develop its battery industry was driven by the need to reduce urban pollution, according to Iggy Tan, executive chair of Lithium Universe. This effort was supported by government regulations, incentives and investment.

But he and other panelists at the event noted some of the different challenges being faced in North America.

“We’ve got a project in Canada that must ensure [that there is] no Chinese investment, shareholders or technology,” Tan said, noting regulatory requirements intended to avoid any hint of Chinese involvement. He suggested that joint ventures, and learning from Chinese technology, could benefit the industry.

Joe Lowry, president of Global Lithium, emphasized the need for policies that enable competition. “If you want to play the game, you have to have a policy that allows you to play the game,” he said during a panel titled Decoding the China playbook.

Strategic investment and opportunities in the US

China was early to identify energy as a strategic industry, leading to significant investment in the lithium-ion battery supply chain, Lowry said.

Howard Margulis of MaxEn Capital Advisors added that Chinese banks and government support have been crucial in funding the sector, including projects outside China.

Both Lowry and Tan pointed out that China has invested strategically in upstream resources globally. This has ensured a steady supply of raw materials. The US could similarly invest strategically on areas such as lithium-rich manganese cathodes to gain a competitive edge, according to Steve LeVine, editor of The Electric.

There were, however, domestic projects emerging in the US that could bring great opportunities to the country, the audience heard.

The US should focus on building its own supply chain, rather than trying to replicate China’s model, Lowry said. The Arkansas Smackover formation provides an excellent opportunity to do so, he said.

China’s cooperation for lithium success

Collaboration with China will be crucial for success, the audience heard. “No one can think we [in the West] can do it all ourselves without the Asian manufacturing machine,” Margulis said. “We are going to have to cooperate somehow.”

Want to keep on the pulse of the evolving lithium market? Visit our hub for industry updates.

What to read next
A new US-backed structure is attempting to turn critical minerals inventory from a cost burden into a strategic asset. Project Vault combines pooled demand, private governance and capped-return financing to create a shared supply buffer—and potentially the first steps toward price discovery in fragmented markets.
US steel mills were operating in April 2026 at their highest capacity utilization rate since 2024, but because many domestic producers have gone long on contracts this year, buyers continued to report difficulty in securing tonnages of steel hot-rolled coil on the spot market.
Copper’s long-term outlook is constrained by the industry’s limited ability to bring new supply online fast enough to meet rising demand, with permitting delays, higher capital costs and policy risks slowing project development, industry executives said at the FT Commodities Global Summit on Wednesday April 22.
The US domestic Galvalume price increased by $30 per ton in April despite soft end demand. The coated price boosted solely based on continuing strength in the hot-rolled coil market, sources said.
Fastmarkets has launched three new critical minerals prices on Friday May 1 to improve transparency in the US market. The additional prices are: MB-BI-0004 – Bismuth 99.99%, ddp US, $/lbMB-IN-0005 – Indium 99.99%, ddp US, $/kgMB-GA-0003 – Gallium 99.99%, ddp US $/kg The launch of the bismuth and indium price assessments follow a consultation period […]
Capital is flowing back into junior mining, but selectively. Investment is increasingly favouring development‑stage assets with clearer paths to production, supported by government funding and strategic partnerships. While demand for critical minerals underpins the cycle, early‑stage explorers continue to struggle for capital as investors prioritise discipline, ESG alignment and near‑term cash flow.