Correction to rationale of iron ore 65% Fe Brazil-origin fines CFR Qingdao: pricing notice

Fastmarkets has corrected the rationale for its MB-IRO-0009 iron ore 65% Fe Brazil-origin fines, cfr Qingdao index, which was published incorrectly on Friday August 8 due to an input error.

The rationale for MB-IRO-0009 iron ore 65% Fe Brazil-origin fines, cfr Qingdao index on Friday August 8 had erroneously omitted the judgment for carry-over step.

The rationale entry has been corrected as follows:

Fastmarkets’ index for iron ore 65% Fe Brazil-origin fines, CFR Qingdao fell by $0.08 per tonne from the previous day. The price movement was based on the visible market activity detailed below, which was included in the index calculation according to the published methodology. For the calculation of the 65% Fe index, judgement was applied to carry over data in today’s indices due to low liquidity in the 24-hour pricing window, corresponding with published fallback measures. In the calculation of 65% Fe index, judgement applied to discard indications that are at a considerable distance from consensus of other participants’ indications of tradeable level. Any data received under Data Submitter Agreements or subject to a confidentiality request will not be published.

Market participants’ indications:

Fastmarkets’ index for iron ore 65% Fe Brazil-origin fines CFR Qingdao
Iron Ore Carajas: $118.20-120.64 per tonne

Trades/offers/bids heard in the market
No visible trading activity

The published price is unaffected by this error.

This price is part of the Fastmarkets steelmaking raw materials package.

For more information, or to provide feedback on this correction notice, or if you would like to provide price information by becoming a data submitter to these indices, please contact pricing@fastmarkets.com. Please add the subject heading “FAO Alice Li, re: iron ore 65% Fe price.”

Please indicate if comments are confidential. Fastmarkets will consider all comments received and will make comments not marked as confidential available upon request.

To see all Fastmarkets’ pricing methodology and specification documents, go to https://www.fastmarkets.com/methodology.

What to read next
The publication of Fastmarkets’ France Cartonboard averages for October 2025 were delayed because of a procedural error. Fastmarkets’ pricing database has been updated.
Following a consultation period, which closed on January 14, Fastmarkets will increase the frequency of its MB-BX-0016 Bauxite, cif China, price assessment to a weekly basis, from a monthly basis. Fastmarkets will also extend the timing of the price to include cargoes for arrival within 90 days and move the publishing time to 7pm Shanghai time on Friday. […]
These would be in addition to the existing price assessments for MB-SB-0001 antimony max 100 ppm Bi, in-whs Rotterdam, and MB-SB-0002 antimony MMTA standard grade II, in-whs Rotterdam. The two existing assessments would not be affected by the proposed additions. The proposal follows the emergence of a widening gap between in-warehouse and CIF Rotterdam prices, which emerged […]
The following price was affected: MB-FEN-0005 Nickel pig iron, 10-14% Ni content, fob Indonesia, $/nickel unit The price is a part of the Fastmarkets Steel Raw Materials package. For more information or to provide feedback on the delayed publication of this price or if you would like to provide price information by becoming a data submitter […]
The publication of Fastmarkets’ MB-MN-0008 Manganese sulfate 32% Mn min, battery grade, exw mainland China, price assessment for Thursday January 22, 2026, was delayed because of a reporter error. Fastmarkets’ pricing database has been updated. The following price was affected: MB-MN-0008 – Manganese sulfate 32% Mn min, battery grade, exw mainland China The price is a […]
Fastmarkets invites feedback on the methodology of its MB-LI-0033 lithium hydroxide, battery grade, spot price cif China, Japan & Korea price and MB-LI-0029 lithium carbonate, battery grade, spot prices cif China, Japan & Korea price. The consultation will consider observed pricing divergences between China, Japan and South Korea.