MethodologyContact usSupportLogin
CORSIA compliance costs are shaped by more than emissions volume alone. Offset eligibility rules, issuance timelines, and host-country authorisations under Article 6 are constraining supply and introducing material pricing and timing risk across CORSIA phases.
As obligations scale through 2035, airlines face increasing exposure to compliance cost volatility, with direct implications for route economics, budgeting discipline, and long-term contracting.
Airlines and aviation stakeholders therefore need forward-looking signals on how policy decisions, registry developments, and market liquidity translate into real compliance costs, not just regulatory intent.
This brochure provides a clear, structured introduction to the data and intelligence Fastmarkets uses to quantify CORSIA compliance cost exposure. It moves beyond policy headlines to practical cost signals aligned with how airlines plan, price, and procure compliance.
Inside the brochure:
CORSIA Phase 1 spot benchmarks and methodology
Eligibility tracking across programs and vintages
Supply signals linked to Article 6 authorization status
How airlines use pricing intelligence to plan compliance costs
Eligibility, issuance, and authorization risks affecting procurement timing
Complete the form to access an overview of how Fastmarkets quantifies CORSIA compliance costs using benchmarks, forecasts, and eligibility intelligence.
Fastmarkets has launched a Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) Phase 1 conditional offtake price assessment on Wednesday April 29.
As Article 6 markets gain momentum, the choice between trajectory and aggregate accounting approaches will shape how many ITMOs countries can trade — and how much supply flows to CORSIA.
The pool of CORSIA Phase 1 cookstove credits that can realistically reach the market is likely far smaller than current expectations..
The Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) market has continued to digest the collapse of cookstove project developer Koko Networks at the end of January following the Kenyan government’s refusal to grant the project a letter of authorization (LoA) and the implications of this for supply going forward.