CBAM regulation report: navigating the EU’s new carbon border rules for metals

Navigate CBAM's impact. Download our expert forecast to protect your margins and reshape your strategy for 2026.

Starting January 2026, the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) regulation will fundamentally change the economics of global trade. For metals suppliers and buyers, this shift brings immediate CBAM exposure that will translate into a real cost structure, directly influencing margins, competitiveness and supply chain strategy. Carbon intensity is no longer just a disclosure metric, it is becoming a key determinant of market access and profitability.

The transition from policy to financial reality is underway, and the implications of CBAM regulation are now shaping procurement decisions across metals supply chains. Importers are actively assessing their CBAM exposure, and producers are re-evaluating assets based on their emissions footprint.

To help leaders navigate this new landscape, Fastmarkets’ experts have created a new forecast report, Margins on the line: CBAM insights for metals suppliers and buyers. This article summarizes some of the key findings and what they mean for your business.

Understanding CBAM’s financial impact

CBAM regulation imposes a carbon charge on imports of steel, aluminium, cement, fertilizers, electricity, and hydrogen, based on their embedded emissions. This charge is linked to the market price of European Union Allowances (EUAs). From 2026, importers must purchase and surrender CBAM certificates to cover these emissions.

This obligation will be phased in as the free allowances under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) are phased out, reaching full effect by 2034. As the supply of EUAs tightens, prices are expected to rise. Fastmarkets analysis projects the EUA price will increase from around €70–75 per tonne in 2025 to approximately €130 per tonne by 2030. This rising cost will be directly transferred to importers of carbon-intensive goods.

The report finds that by 2034, carbon costs will represent a material share of import value for most CBAM-covered goods. This will redefine cost competitiveness, making carbon efficiency as critical as traditional drivers like labor, energy, and logistics.

Which metals face the highest CBAM exposure?

The iron and steel sector faces the most significant carbon border exposure, accounting for roughly 75% of potential CBAM liabilities. Aluminium is a distant second.

  • Steel: The sector’s emissions intensity varies widely, creating both risk and opportunity. At an EUA price of €90 in 2026, importers of high-intensity steel could face extra costs of €40–€60 per tonne. Upstream products like steel slab face the highest proportional costs, potentially exceeding 20% of import value.
  • Aluminium: While the sector’s current liability is smaller than steel’s, it remains significant. Projections show aluminium importers could collectively face liabilities near €500 million in 2026. A key uncertainty is whether indirect emissions from electricity will be included in the future. If so, total CBAM costs for aluminium could surge from €1 billion to €4.7 billion by 2030, penalizing exporters with carbon-intensive grids.

Country-level CBAM exposure and strategic risks

CBAM’s impact is not evenly distributed. The CBAM report highlights that over half of projected CBAM costs by 2030 will be tied to exports from just five countries: India, Türkiye, China, Ukraine, and Russia.

India, for example, is expected to bear 18% of total CBAM costs, nearly double its share of EU import value. This is due to its reliance on blast furnace steelmaking and the absence of a domestic carbon price. In contrast, countries with cleaner production methods, like the US and South Korea, will gain a competitive edge.

For buyers, this concentration of liability creates new geopolitical and trade-related risks. It is now crucial to map supplier exposure not just by facility, but by jurisdiction, and to anticipate how trade patterns might shift in response to these new cost pressures.

Your guide to navigating CBAM regulation in a carbon-adjusted world

CBAM is not just a compliance exercise, it is the architecture through which the EU is exporting its carbon price to global trade. For any business involved in the metals supply chain, carbon now sits on the balance sheet.

The Margins on the line report provides commercial, procurement, and finance leaders with a quantified view of CBAM exposure across steel and aluminium supply chains. It translates complex regulatory risk into actionable insights, helping you to refine strategy, manage costs, and maintain a competitive advantage.


If you want to sanity-check your CBAM exposure assumptions against your supplier mix and routes with our latest EU ETS price modelling, speak with our carbon team.

What to read next
The contrasting approaches to AI adoption in Asia’s energy tube and pipe industry are most visible when comparing China’s scale-driven transformation with Japan’s precision-focused strategy.
Explore how trends, supply shifts and consolidation are transforming the food and beverage packaging market. Leverage independent data for a clearer packaging market outlook and confident procurement decisions.
Low-emission steelmaking capacity in Europe is currently constrained amid challenging market conditions. However, recent regulatory developments have strengthened supplier confidence, helping to unlock next phase of investments. Over the coming decade, electric-arc-furnace flat steel capacity is forecast to expand significantly — led primarily by lower-cost, though not necessarily lowest-emissions, production routes. At the same time, producers are expected to prioritise greater feedstock flexibility to enhance resilience against shifting input costs and market volatility.
Brazil’s government has imposed three anti-dumping measures on steel imports so far in 2026, largely targeting shipments from China and, in one case, from India
Four years after Russia’s unprovoked, attempted full-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, Fastmarkets examines how the war has reshaped the Ukrainian and global steel and grain markets, outlining the key challenges faced by these sectors as they have adapted and endured.
The Canadian government’s recent efforts to curb unfair steel imports and protectionist measures for its domestic steel industry are “not enough,” and Canada needs to do “exactly what the US is doing,” the executive chairman and chief executive officer of Zekelman Industries, Barry Zekelman, told Fastmarkets in an exclusive interview on Wednesday February 11.