Final decision on open consultation on methodology review for Global Pulp

Fastmarkets invited feedback from the industry on the pricing methodology for Global Pulp, via an open consultation process between May 23 and June 25, 2025. This consultation was done as part of our published annual methodology review process.

Full details of the prices covered by this consultation can be found here: https://www.fastmarkets.com/insights/open-consultation-on-annual-methodology-review-for-global-pulp-pricing-notice/

During the consultation, Fastmarkets requested comments on whether current discount levels for US market pulp have grown too high and invited open-ended feedback on potential remedies moving forward.

Feedback from the industry was mixed. Potential remedies suggested by the industry included resetting effective list prices with lower discounts than existing ones, the assessment of net prices on regular contract business, and maintaining the current effective list price system.

Fastmarkets has continued to hear concerns about the widening gap between net and effective list prices and is therefore evaluating market interest in adjusting existing effective list prices to more reasonable levels above net prices. IMPORTANT: Any such initiative would only be carried out in close consultation with industry stakeholders and with significant advance notice.

This consultation sought to ensure that our methodologies continue to reflect the physical market under indexation, in compliance with the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) principles for Price Reporting Agencies (PRAs). This includes all elements of our pricing process, our price specifications and publication frequency.

You can find the current methodology for Global Pulp here:  https://www.fastmarkets.com/methodology/forest-products/global-market-pulp/

To see all Fastmarkets pricing methodology and specification documents, go to https://www.fastmarkets.com/methodology

What to read next
Fastmarkets initially consulted on location of delivery, exact sizing and impurities of materials and payment terms following feedback that these parameters should be narrowed. But feedback from some market participants has been incomplete during the consultation period, requiring greater time to achieve clarity on these points. Furthermore, since the consultation launched, the UAE has announced a reverse […]
These changes are based partly on market feedback and on changes to regional production and SAF flows to Chicago and Los Angeles. Additionally, the calculations for feedstock production volume loss have been updated with market feedback. The new calculation assumes maximized SAF output at a hydrotreated esters and fatty acids (HEFA) production facility, and so […]
Fastmarkets is inviting feedback from the industry on its pricing methodology and product specifications for non-ferrous materials and industrial minerals, as part of its announced annual methodology review process.
Explore the challenges facing the global copper smelting industry in 2026, including supply-demand imbalances and market uncertainties.
The MB-W-0002 tungsten concentrate 65% WO3, in-whs China was incorrectly published as 45,000-46,000 yuan per tonne due to a typo error. This has been corrected to 450,000-460,000 yuan per tonne. Fastmarkets’ pricing database has been updated to reflect this change. This price is part of Fastmarkets’ ores and alloys physical price package. For more information or to provide […]
Fastmarkets wishes to clarify how conditional bids and offers are used in its CFR China iron ore price assessments.