US senators seek clarity on EPA’s small refinery exemption process

Latest Environmental Protection Agency's proposed Renewable Volume Obligations (RVOs) received with mixed reactions

A group of US senators from Wyoming and eight senate Republicans have requested clarity from US energy secretary Jennifer Granholm around the process for vetting and approving the state’s small refinery exemptions (SRE) to the renewable fuel standard.

In a recent letter, signed by senators Cynthia Lummis and John Barrasso as well as other senators, the officials shared their “strong concerns” regarding the Department of Energy’s role in “scoring petitions filed under the small refinery exemption program in the Renewable Fuel Standard and inquiring about the steps DOE plans to take to remedy these shortcomings.”

The letter pointed to a November 2022 report from the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) that examined the policies and procedures of the DOE and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for the exemption decisions.

Small refinery exemption process

The EPA can grant exemptions if the refiners can prove compliance with the mandates caused financial hardship.

In early April 2022, the EPA denied 36 petitions from refiners seeking exemptions to 2018 biofuel blending laws due to financial hardship.

Meanwhile, the four refineries in the state of Wyoming operate within the parameters of the small refinery exemption.

“Despite repeated requests for the EPA to reconsider its decisions regarding small refinery exemptions to the renewable fuel standard, as well as a GAO report refuting their actions, Administrator Reagan and his staff have decided to double down on their actions against the small refineries that operate across Wyoming,” Lummis said in the letter.

In December 2021, the EPA attempted to block all pending SRE requests.

In January 2022, meanwhile, Lummis and her colleagues sent a letter to the EPA, citing concern for the new approach to SRE petitions.

Late last year, a group of US senators wrote to the EPA calling for greater renewable volume obligations (RVOs) ahead of the release of the 2023 blending targets in December, stating that previously, renewable volume obligations (RVOs), which were backed by statutory volumes, had been undermined by SREs.

The Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed Renewable Volume Obligations (RVOs), which were finally released on December 1 after being delayed several times, called for an increased overall blending mandate of 20.82 billion gallons for 2023, 21.87 billion gallons for 2024 and 22.68 billion gallons for 2025, prompting highly mixed industry reactions.

What to read next
The biofuels market is transitioning from rapid growth to a focus on margin optimization, carbon intensity differentiation, and regulatory compliance, driven by low-carbon policies in the US and EU that are reshaping feedstock demand, trade flows, and pricing dynamics.
The global tungsten market in 2026 is marked by extreme volatility driven by geopolitical tensions, trade disputes, and resource nationalism, especially between China and the US. These dynamics have caused significant supply disruptions and price surges across tungsten products.
In the past year, trade policy has and continues to fuel change and dynamics in the North American steel market. Meanwhile, inflation has remained at or above 2.7% while the Fed Fund rate hovers around 2.64. The consumer continues to bear a growing burden to keep the economy from stalling, as finished goods markets search for their own nadir, stability and potential growth paths.
Soybean oil prices rose to 67.3 cents, driven by Middle East disruptions and strong biofuel margins. Fastmarkets predicts continued price strength amid geopolitical risks.
US animal fats and oils markets have moved higher in recent weeks alongside gains in soybean oil futures and diesel values, with improving renewable diesel and biodiesel economics driving stronger demand for feedstocks.
The recent wave of anti-dumping measures approved in Brazil has been met with some concern in China — the country most affected by the Brazilian government’s decisions in this case — but despite the negative impact, Chinese participants see the moves as just another phase of doing business.