The LME’s block trade plans | Hotter Commodities

The London Metal Exchange has unveiled a series of proposals which, if successful, could accomplish what it failed to achieve close to a decade ago: bringing the investment community into the fold

In 2015, the LME embarked on the ‘Liquidity Roadmap’, a plan to boost market transparency and increase the number of investor participants as well as volumes.

Within two years, LME volumes were down and eating into the exchange’s profits, a consequence of business migrating to the over-the-counter (OTC) market. Something had clearly gone strategically awry, and the LME chief executive officer at the time, Garry Jones, departed the exchange.

Now the LME has a new plan to not just attract investors but to also stem the flow of business to the OTC market, including to the numerous OTC platforms that have been created over the years.

Get notified when Andrea Hotter publishes new articles and interviews on the natural resources sector. Receive the latest stories straight to your inbox.

In a White Paper proposal published earlier on Wednesday September 4, the LME’s pivotal focus is introducing block trades for bilaterally negotiated transactions.

From the second half of 2025, small trades on liquid dates of up to 10 lots would have to be placed on LMEselect, the exchange’s electronic trading platform. If, after five seconds, the order was not filled on the system, then the trade can be taken off the screen and crossed by the member.

If you’re wondering what would prevent business simply shifting away from the LME to the OTC market, the LME thought of that too.

The same block trade rules would apply to OTC contracts of ten lots and below referencing LME prices or infrastructure. They would also affect trades on the various dealer-to-client platforms that have emerged in recent years, and which offer proprietary monthly pricing direct to clients.

Hard to get around that, then.

The block limits apply to trades on the monthly date out to one year, and carries between those monthly dates, on the LME’s five most liquid metals – aluminium, copper, zinc, nickel and lead.

The limits don’t apply to daily prompt dates or cash outright trades, nor to ring trades, conditions that are designed to protect and provide comfort for the physical community at the very heart of the exchange’s ecosystem.

All of these changes would take place using version 10 of LMEselect, which is in testing phase with members, and which will be rolled out fully early next year.

In announcing the planned changes, the LME also revealed some interesting facts about the composition of its trading volumes.

The biggest surprise is that 48% of LME trades are on LMEselect, with the ring accounting for less than 1% and the remaining majority being inter-office bilateral transactions.

That’s obviously not a bad thing – electronic markets couldn’t handle the many bespoke dates or averaging services that are provided in the inter-office market by members to their clients.

But that’s where the next statistic comes in: the LME also noted that 75% of open interest resides on the third Wednesday monthly dates, yet just 2% of those monthly volumes are traded on LMEselect.

Clearly the LME believes there is room to boost that 2%, increasing liquidity and transparency on the electronic monthly contracts that the investment community claims it wants to trade but cannot because a liquid price doesn’t exist on LMEselect.

There will, naturally, be opposition from certain members, particularly smaller dealers who use the inter-office market, and larger dealers who are active in operating member-to-client screens. The latter has become a sizeable business for banking participants as well as a few Category I and II members of the exchange.

It is, however, very difficult for those participants to argue that clients would be better off trading these small volume transactions off-exchange in so-called dark pools, instead of consolidating pricing for small transactions in a more transparent, liquid central order book on the LME, eventually creating tighter spreads.

Former LME CEO Jones long maintained a dogged belief that future growth for the exchange would come from electronic participants. With a keen eye to balancing the need to protect core physical users of the exchange, current CEO Matthew Chamberlain must certainly believe so too.

In Hotter Commodities, special correspondent Andrea Hotter covers some of the biggest stories impacting the natural resources sector. Sign up today to receive Andrea’s content as it is published.

What to read next
Fastmarkets will include EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) costs in its secondary aluminium billet premium, ddp Europe (MB-AL-0383) and its primary aluminium 6063 extrusion billet premium, in-whs dp Rotterdam (MB-AL-0002) assessments from January 1, 2026, when the definitive period of the EU’s CBAM is set to begin. The inclusion of CBAM costs with MB-AL-0383 and MB-AL-0002 will enable […]
Read the key takeaways from a recent conversation on Fast Forward podcast with Vedanta Resources CEO, Deshnee Naidoo, and Andrea Hotter
Gain valuable insights into the copper market outlook 2026, including key trends and challenges facing mines and smelters next year.
Fastmarkets launches a price assessment for MB-AL-0426 aluminium scrap, old sheet (Taint/Tabor), shredded and sorted, delivered consumer Europe, % of LME, on Friday November 28.
Fastmarkets’ pricing database has been updated. The publication of the affected price was delayed for 1 hour and 43 minutes. The following assessment was published late: MB-ZN-0099 Zinc SHG min 99.995% ingot premium, dp fca Antwerp, $/tonne This price is a part of the Fastmarkets base metals package. For more information or to provide feedback on […]
Fastmarkets’ pricing database has been updated. The publication of the affected price was delayed for 1 hour and 43 minutes. The following price was affected: MB-AL-0004 Aluminium P1020A premium, in-whs dp Rotterdam, $/tonne This price is a part of the Fastmarkets’ base metals package. For more information or to provide feedback on the delayed publication of […]