US mills not yet capturing green steel premiums seen in Europe and Asia

Collecting a premium for green flat-rolled steel in the US will be a long, bottom-up process for an industry already regarded as one of the world’s cleanest, market sources recently told Fastmarkets

When end-users are willing to pay more for low-carbon emission steel, mills will be ready to provide, one service center executive said.

“The success of any green steel initiative is going to hinge on acceptance all the way downstream – the end user,” the executive said. “If the end users will not pay the higher price, it is unreasonable to have the distributor pay for the burden of a higher green price from the mill…ultimately, if this is going to be successful, it will occur over years.”

At least some auto producers are trumpeting their low-carbon sourcing standards. Mercedes-Benz signed a deal with Nucor in March for its low-carbon Econiq™ sheet, and the auto maker signed a similar deal with Steel Dynamics Inc in September.

It is unclear what premium, if any, Mercedes-Benz paid for the low-carbon sheet.

What is green steel?

At least some of the confusion surrounding green steel lies in the definition; green steel has been characterized to Fastmarkets as everything from hot-rolled coil produced in an electric-arc furnace (EAF) to true zero-carbon steel produced without fossil fuels.

Reported premiums start from about $40 per short ton, which Cleveland-Cliffs charges as a surcharge for its products made with hot-briquetted iron.

Cleveland-Cliffs has previously described its Cliffs H surcharge as the “only true green steel premium.”

Yet steelmakers are commanding much higher figures in both Europe and Asia.

Fastmarkets’ green steel import, differential to HRC index, cfr Vietnam price was $204-340 per tonne on Friday May 10, while its equivalent green steel domestic, flat-rolled, differential to HRC index, exw Northern Europe was at $150-250 per tonne on Thursday May 9.

The carbon threshold for Fastmarkets’ Asian green steel price is 1.3 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2) emitted per 1 tonne of steel produced (tonne CO2/1 tonne steel), while Europe’s threshold is 1 tonne CO2/1 tonne steel. Both thresholds encompass Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions.

Due to the preponderance of EAF steelmaking in the US, it is likely that a proposed green steel threshold would be below 1 tonne CO2/1 tonne steel, according to a variety of market sources polled by Fastmarkets.

Leaving green on the table

Whether US mills can charge more for a natively greener product, however, remains to be seen.

“As far as green steel, we do not offer it, we do not buy it and I doubt we ever will unless we are forced to buy it,” one distributor said, disparaging the green steel movement in general. “We are the least polluting steel industry in the world. I say when everyone matches our numbers, then we all start working it down from there.”

Moral high ground aside, at least some buyers are scouting green steel options ahead of projected customer demand to avoid leaving money on the table.

“[I] do agree that the branded products are asking for that $30-50 per short ton range, but the push is not there outside of our European based customers, who are figuring out that by replacing any of their integrated buys with a mini-mill, they get a significant [carbon] reduction,” one buyer said.

A second buyer said they hope to jump the market, despite a current lack of inquiries.

“Currently, none of my customer base has asked us for low-carbon steel products, so I haven’t gone down that path just yet,” they said. “Going into my contract negotiations for 2025, I will be bringing this topic up, as I’d like to get ahead of the game and be able to bring options to my main customers when needed.”

Another buyer opined that mills will soon have to make the leap from simply quantifying their carbon emission savings to getting paid for them.

“Right now, I am seeing customers in the data collection period,” they said. “They are asking about emissions. But I have not seen that transfer into influencing purchasing decisions yet. I see producers publishing emissions reports, but how will they quantify that into a value?”

Discover how our suite of green steel prices can support your ‘green’ investment decisions while bringing transparency to the industry. Find out more.

Follow the low-carbon steel discussion and keep up-to-date with the developments influencing the decarbonization of the steel industry

What to read next
Japanese steel major Nippon Steel is aiming to hit its 2050 goal of carbon neutrality by focusing on hydrogen-based direct reduced iron (DRI) to make a breakthrough in green steel production, the company said on Friday May 30.
The European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism will be implemented in seven months’ time but the region’s steel industry was still not fully prepared for the gradual changes the system will involve, Fastmarkets heard on Thursday May 8 at the Made in Steel trade fair in Milan, Italy.
The global steel industry’s move to decarbonize and China’s penchant for lower-grade ores in recent years have uncovered challenges for high-grade iron ore to live out its value in both the blast furnace-based steelmaking route and the direct-reduction iron process, delegates told Fastmarkets during the Singapore International Ferrous Week (SIFW), which takes place from May 26-30.
The global iron ore market, a pivotal component of the steelmaking industry, has historically been driven by simple supply and demand dynamics. However, steel trade tariffs, trade wars and a growing trend toward resource nationalism are reshaping this once-basic industrial staple. These forces, alongside rising environmental regulations and shifting trade patterns, are profoundly influencing iron ore pricing, production and consumption trends. 
The playing field for global iron ore brands could be poised to be leveled, given a recent announcement on lower iron content in a key mainstream Australian direct shipping ore, iron ore market participants told Fastmarkets, adding that the development could narrow the price disparities between major Australian mid-grade iron ore brands.
This strategic launch is intended to offer the market a single reference price denoting the differential between US Midwest rebar and heavy melting-grade scrap, a key component in the production of that grade. Details of the previous launches can be found via this link. The methodology specification for this differential is: MB-STE-0930 Steel reinforcing bar […]