Black Sea grains tempt Asia’s buyers with low prices

Following the agreement for a safe grain corridor, wheat and corn cargoes are loading in Black Sea ports, but buyers' concerns remain

Black Sea wheat offers have been dropping fast in the last week amid the opening of the grain corridor from Ukraine that has increased flows. While news of record wheat production forecast in Russia has meant that offers from these origins have become the cheapest options for Asian destinations.

Yet, despite the low prices, buyers are still being cautious about stepping in and making purchases.

Ukrainian 11.5% wheat offers fell by $30 per tonne last week to $355 per tonne basis offers delivered CFR into Vietnam or Indonesia for the September loading.

Russian wheat selling ideas were also in free fall during the same period. Although, the latest offers on the same basis were heard at a slightly higher level, closer to $370 per tonne.

Overall buying ideas remain well below, with levels heard at $346 per tonne CFR.

“For Russian origin [wheat], buyers can possibly pay a little more, since it will definitely be delivered. But only a little more. Ukrainian [prices] can go down further since while the corridor is working, it is necessary to sell and export and turn this into money,” one broker said, contrasting the situation with Russia, where he felt levels had limited downside.

The pressure also comes as freight rates are at very high levels from the Black Sea, with ideas for Ukrainian cargoes delivered into Asia heard at around $75 per tonne. In comparison, the freight for Russian loads is thought to range from around $55 to $75 per tonne, depending on the cargo and the fleet.

Indian or Chinese shipowners are likely to be at the lower end of the scale. Still, prices are much higher if the vessels are Greek-owned, a particularly pressing factor since the largest fleet is mostly European-owned, freight sources told Fastmarkets Agriculture.

Meanwhile, most trade sources speaking to Fastmarkets have said that, for now, they are still cautious about both Ukrainian and Russian origins because of the implied risks. The main concern is that if the recently agreed corridor closed at any time because of further attacks or new sanctions on Russian exports, cargoes would simply not be delivered.

The challenges facing wheat importers

Importers are said to be facing financial difficulties while they are looking to resume Ukrainian imports, with some banks refusing to issue letters of credit (LC) amid the war risks.

“The problem the buyers are concerned about is that no bank and no insurance company will agree to do for their contract if it’s done,” a Vietnam-based trader told Fastmarkets.

“Let the brave ones move first. I wish to play third fiddle,” a buyer based in Indonesia said.

Also, some buyers have confirmed a preference for Australian wheat, as the price gap when compared is relatively small. But the issue with Australian wheat is that old crop for September through December dates is already booked, and there is a lack of capacity.

At the same time, Vietnam has allowed at least two Russian wheat cargoes to be imported as a test exercise after a meeting was held in the country between the Russian and Vietnamese phytosanitary agencies.

Corn shipments

The same situation was reported in the corn market too. In this case, buyers have been searching for more competitive price options – with competition still coming from shipments out of South America and Myanmar currently quoted in a range of $330-335 per tonne CFR southern ports for September-December loading windows.

A rumor circulated the market earlier this week about a cargo of Ukrainian corn traded to Vietnam at $300 per tonne CFR southern ports, with the trade said to be between a multinational trader Viterra and Vietnam’s biggest importer Tan Long. However, full details are hard to confirm.

The cargo was also said to be an already-afloat vessel, which could explain the cited price level.

Another rumor the same week was that some Ukrainian corn had been sold to South Korea for September-October dates, but again, it is difficult to find any evidence to confirm this.

Unfortunately, at least for the time being, it remains almost impossible to get detailed and reliable information regarding new trades into Asia, while on the freight side of the market, trade sources reported that a few panamaxes had been prepped from Asia, and at least two were already on their way to Ukrainian ports where they would be loaded.

What to read next
US wheat futures and Euronext contracts were mixed on Tuesday June 16, with most US contracts moving lower, while Chicago soft red winter wheat futures posted gains. Euronext contracts also moved higher during the session. Global cash markets remained subdued, with limited activity as buyers largely stayed on the sidelines. Black Sea wheat prices are starting to trend lower under seasonal harvest pressure, while Australia, Europe and Argentina were broadly steady.
Soybean and soybean meal futures continued to ride on the coattails of the bullish National Oilseed Processors Association (NOPA) crush report on Tuesday June 16, with market chatter that China is bidding on — or indeed may have already bought — US beans for February, giving much-lauded impetus to further increases in futures markets over the period.
Soybean oil bases in Argentina and Brazil hit a record spread to their counterpart in the US Gulf on June 1, with a mix of biofuel policies, harvest pressures and export competition against rival oils creating massive regional divergences, although the spread decreased by the end of last week amid a CME soyoil futures sell-off.
EU wheat exports reached 19.23 million tonnes as of May 31, according to European Commission data, yet weekly flow data from Rouen port collapsed 66.6% to 72,923 tonnes in the week to June 3, pointing to a sharp deceleration in physical trade.
Fastmarkets’ weekly recap of the main movements in global cash markets.
Price spreads across European biofuel feedstocks and biodiesel markets widened sharply during the week to Thursday May 28, driven primarily by a steep decline in gasoil values and higher vegetable oil prices.