EU energy fears eased, but long-term concerns linger

European energy analysts' “what if” questions have turned into “what now” questions in the wake of Russia’s stalled war efforts against Ukraine

Predictions that a massive energy crisis would develop because of overdependence on Russian natural gas, subsequently leading to an economic recessionary crash, never materialized. But the fear remains.

There were concerns that Europe would not get through the winter without Russian gas and that its economy might collapse,

Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS)

In a recent report, the CSIS said that “Europe has held firm and adapted. However, despite the strong response to the war, comprehensive structural changes to Europe’s economy and security architecture have yet to materialize.”

Some analysts are now saying the European Union managed to slap a Band-Aid on a gaping chest wound last year.

“Europe kind of lucked out with warmer-than-expected weather and avoiding a lot of these energy supply issues we were warning people about for six-to-nine months,” Nick Webb, director of Risk Management and Commodity Hedging at Ryerson said on a recent podcast.

“There was never that ‘oh-no moment’ where they had to turn off manufacturing and turn off the economy to ration energy usage. But I still think some of those energy issues may be on the table and we just kicked the can down the road several months or maybe even several years.”

The ongoing challenge is the balancing act between keeping the lights on and maintaining manufacturing production – including in the steel sector – amid goals to shed dependence on Russian gas.

Accomplishing that feat with renewable energy and increased liquified natural gas import facilities won’t happen overnight, analysts said.

“In the European Union, there is a growing fear that US subsidies, combined with high energy costs triggered by the Russian invasion of Ukraine, might lead to the deindustrialization of Europe,” the CSIS said.

The REPowerEU plan instituted last year by the European Union aims to diversify alternative energy supplies, including renewable hydrogen and acceleration of clean energy like wind and solar that can be produced domestically.

“Around 30% of EU primary steel production is expected to be decarbonized on the basis of renewable hydrogen by 2030,” the European Commission said in the plan.

According to the CSIS, the EU has already sped up installments and deployment of other renewable energy production.

“New solar power installations grew by 47% in 2022, equivalent to the power needs of 12.4 million European homes,” the CSIS report stated. “Although volatile costs generated strong headwinds for wind-turbine suppliers, new wind capacity also expanded moderately in 2022, with onshore wind accounting for about 90% of this growth. It is estimated that growth in wind and solar capacity may have saved it $11 billion in gas imports since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.”

For now, at least, catastrophic fears of an energy-based economic collapse have been abated. The “what ifs” come back into play when thinking about the winter months of late 2023 and early 2024.

What to read next
How Europe’s green steel production competes with the rest of the world
The steel market is increasingly pivoting away from blast furnace (BF) production and toward electric-arc furnaces (EAFs), Keith Shuttlesworth, chief commercial officer of clean iron technology company Electra, told Fastmarkets in an interview on Tuesday March 10.
The auto industry is well-positioned to accelerate the use of lower emissions steel and automakers are increasingly using the material to boost competitiveness in the EV market.
The outbreak of conflict between the US, Israel and Iran on February 28 has brought shipping through the Strait of Hormuz to a near halt, disrupting China’s steel exports to a region that accounted for 14% of its total finished steel export volume in 2025.
The recent wave of anti-dumping measures approved in Brazil has been met with some concern in China — the country most affected by the Brazilian government’s decisions in this case — but despite the negative impact, Chinese participants see the moves as just another phase of doing business.
This consultation was done as part of our published annual methodology review process. No feedback was received about a methodology change during the consultation period and therefore no changes will be made to the methodologies at this stage. This consultation sought to ensure that our methodologies continue to reflect the physical CFR Manila steel billet market, in […]