MethodologyContact usSupportLogin
Key takeaways:
China’s pipe industry, grappling with chronic overcapacity, is attempting to navigate its intelligent transformation through a “scale-driven” strategy.
This approach, characterized by massive, integrated investments in automation and data transparency, is yielding impressive results for its champions. However, a deeper analysis reveals a core paradox: the very success of this model at the top tier is exacerbating the competitive divide, making the path it forged increasingly inaccessible for the broader market.
AI success stories: Baosteel and beyond
Baosteel, the top pipe producer in China, stands as a prime example of this strategy in action. The company applies AI models to optimize the entire production process of high-grade seamless and welded pipe, leveraging its computing power centers for smarter decision-making.
Although specific pipe-making AI investments are undisclosed, Baosteel’s other group-wide achievements signal the potential. From 2024, it launched the steel industry’s first large-scale model, and the Cold-Rolling AI Operator developed bby its subsidiary Baoxin Software has already produced over 40,000 steel coils, achieving a 90% utilization rate, cutting costs per tonne of steel by 3.79%, and increasing annual profit on the single production line by RMB 14.98 million.
This demonstrates a clear blueprint where heavy upfront investment and massive production data in intelligent upgrading, potentially amounting to tens of billions of RMB for base-wide transformation, generate substantial annual returns, justifying the “scale-driven” label.
Similarly, in other major pipe producers like Baotou Steel, its intelligent coupling line renovation processing project has significantly reduced the product defect rate. Tianjin Pipe has deployed AI vision quality inspection robots in the seamless pipe thread processing workshop, which has improved the detection accuracy and efficiency of key dimensions such as thread tightness by more than ten times.
Yet, this blueprint constitutes the central challenge. The widespread overcapacity and high inventory that initially pressured the industry to transform are the very factors that now prevent the majority of small and medium-sized pipe factories from following suit.
For these players, the heavy-asset, capital-intensive nature of the vanguard’s AI integration model is prohibitively risky. The success of giants like Baosteel, therefore, does not illuminate a path for others but rather highlights a widening moat.
The scale-driven strategy, while rational for the leaders, inadvertently reinforces a “winner-takes-most” dynamic, leaving the industry’s long tail of smaller players trapped between thin profits and an unaffordable digital leap.
The current situation is that Baoxin Software’s Manufacturing Execution System(MSE) has taken up 68% of the domestic market share in the steel industry, with large amounts of orders coming from Baowu’s large-scale branches like Baosteel Zhanjiang plant and Wuhan Steel.
This strategy has not only improved the overall efficiency of the industry but also triggered a profound “ecological paradox”. The core challenge of this diffusion model led by top enterprises has transcended traditional concerns about market monopoly and evolved into a risk of “structural dependence”.
For the vast number of small and medium-sized pipe mills, adopting the AI platform developed by the industry’s biggest competitor as the core operational brain is tantamount to handing over their own “digital lifeline” to the other party.
This not only raises concerns about data sovereignty and trade secret security, but also creates a strategic distrust: can they be confident that AI optimization suggestions are based on maximizing their own interests, rather than invisibly consolidating Baosteel’s competitive advantage? This sense of distrust will become a big obstacle to the widespread adoption of the AI model.
Furthermore, the rise of this single dominant platform may suppress the innovation vitality of the technology market.
A technology path driven by internal demands of giants can easily evolve into a ‘standard answer’, squeezing the living space of other small and medium-sized AI solution providers who focus on specific scenarios and may be more innovative, leading to a ‘Darwinist’ style degradation of the technology ecosystem rather than a diversity of options.
Want to know more about how AI is impacting the steel industry? Access Fastmarkets’ steel price data, market analysis and forecasting today.