Tesla-Syrah graphite deal signals OEMs taking notice of anode supply bottlenecks

Recent supply agreement between Tesla and graphite producer Syrah Resources for graphite anode material signals that original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) are starting to notice the need to secure the supply of materials beyond battery cathode components

Under the agreement, Australia’s Syrah Resources will supply United States electric vehicles (EVs) manufacturer Tesla with natural graphite active anode material from its Vidalia production facility in the US at a fixed price for four years, starting with the first commercial production at the site.

Syrah’s share price surged 32% on the news – a sign that the market did not underestimate the significance of the agreement for the future of the company.

The deal is significant for Syrah since it earmarks the majority of the projected output from its proposed expansion of the Vidalia operation to a large consumer. The agreement comes with an option for Tesla to buy additional volumes from Vidalia, subject to Syrah expanding its anode capacity beyond 10,000 tonnes per year, according to the announcement.

The company is due to make a final decision next month on whether to pursue the capacity expansion at the site, and is in the process of assessing the financing commitment needed. The agreement to supply Tesla would weigh positively on the financial planning of the operation.

Until now, the attention on the part of OEMs to look at their future supply of battery components had almost been entirely on cathodes. Lithium, in particular, has been the subject of many a deal struck this year to date, from both existing suppliers and oncoming projects, some of which are still years away from first production.

A source at an international OEM recently lamented to Fastmarkets how “automakers have been entirely focused on cathode materials, while anode has been in the backseat.”

The share of costs is the main reason for that, he added. Component costs in battery cathodes are higher than in anodes, as the rally in lithium and cobalt prices this year has shown. As such, cost management has prioritized cathode raw materials sourcing and price planning.

As the source put it: “Cutting 1% in cathode [costs] gives you higher savings than 1% in anode.”

The perception of supply shortages on the cathode side supports this, given the progressive tightness lithium and cobalt have displayed in 2021.

Prices for graphite, both natural flake as well as natural-based spherical, have also increased in the past few months amid logistical constraints, higher demand and an energy crunch in China, although the pace of growth has been nowhere near as staggering as that of, say, lithium.

Availability projections for graphite are likewise less dire. While the lithium shortage is already here, sentiment for future graphite availability is still more relaxed.

That said, graphite is a mainstay component of battery anodes across the main battery chemistries employed by the EV sector today. In volume terms, the share of graphite is quite large, especially in some chemistries.

Other alternatives, such as silicon anode, are expected to make important inroads in the next couple of years.

Using silicon anode would reduce the graphite component but, again, the technology is still in development, and has not been adopted. Widespread adoption in the automotive industry is a long process, and today, what you have in anodes is graphite, not silicon.

If on the one hand automakers are open to exploring alternative technologies that could offer upsides in performance and costs, they still have to play with existing technologies in the meantime, and plan accordingly.

How to source graphite is a question that will need answering.

And supply bottlenecks for graphite anode already exist.

The global market remains ever so skewed toward China’s solid dominance. The country hosts most of the spherical graphite processing capacity, is one of the largest producers of synthetic graphite – normally blended with coated spherical (CSPG) into battery anodes – and is home to the largest anode manufacturers.

Non-Chinese presence in spherical graphite and in graphite anode material is still under development.

Syrah is expected to be the first ex-China graphite producer to move into successful production of active anode material. Other graphite producers are also moving downstream into the battery space, aiming to counter China’s supply dominance.

While supply tightness may be less visible on the horizon for graphite anode than for cathode materials, some strategic planning on securing supply will have to feature in Western OEMs’ considerations.

There is expectation in the market that the deal between Syrah and Tesla will push other OEMs to take stock of the graphite bottlenecks and move accordingly.

What to read next
The US aluminium industry is experiencing challenges related to tariffs, which have contributed to higher prices and premiums, raising questions about potential impacts on demand. Alcoa's CEO has noted that sustained high prices could affect the domestic market. While trade agreements might provide some relief, analysts expect premiums to remain elevated in the near term. However, aluminum demand is projected to grow over the long term, supported by the energy transition and clean energy projects. To meet this demand, the industry will need to increase production, restart idle smelters and address factors such as electricity costs and global competition.
The DRC is set to decide on the future of its cobalt export ban on June 22, potentially extending, modifying or ending the policy. Aimed at boosting local refining and value creation, the ban has left global markets uncertain, with stakeholders calling for clarity as cobalt prices fluctuate and concerns over long-term demand grow.
Read Fastmarkets' monthly battery raw materials market update for May 2025, focusing on raw materials including lithium, cobalt, nickel, graphite and more
Cobalt Holdings plans to acquire 6,000 tonnes of cobalt. Following their $230M London Stock Exchange listing, this move secures a key cobalt reserve. With the DRC’s export ban affecting prices, the decision reflects shifting industry dynamics
The recent US-China agreement to temporarily reduce tariffs is a major step for global trade, with tariffs on US goods entering China dropping from 125% to 10% and on Chinese goods entering the US decreasing from 145% to 30% starting May 14. While this has boosted markets and created optimism, key industries like autos and steel remain affected, leaving businesses waiting for clearer long-term trade policies.
The US-China trade truce announced on May 12 has brought cautious optimism to China’s non-ferrous metals markets, signaling a possible shift in global trade. Starting May 14, the removal of additional tariffs has impacted sectors like battery raw materials, minor metals and base metals such as zinc and nickel, with mixed reactions. While the improved sentiment has lifted futures prices and trade activity, the long-term effects remain unclear due to challenges like supply-demand pressures and export controls.