Brazil raises biodiesel mandate from B10 to B12

The increased mandate is welcome by the biofuel sector

Brazil’s biodiesel mandate will be raised from the current 10% level (B10) to 12% (B12) from April, with a progressive ramp-up in mandates scheduled to reach 15% (B15) by 2026, the country’s national energy policy committee CNPE decided Friday, March 17.

The biodiesel sector celebrated the decision.

“This initiative brings juridical predictability for the biodiesel sector to intensify its investments and puts Brazil in the pathway to lead global diesel decarbonization efforts,” Brazil’s vegetable oils association (Abiove) said in a note immediately after the announcement.

The increase in the blending mandate came in broadly aligned with industry expectations, although the announced ramp-up schedule is more cautious than the country’s biodiesel sector had advocated for.

Brazil’s vegetable oils association (Abiove), Brazil’s biofuels producers’ association (Aprobio), Brazil’s union of biodiesel and biokerosene (Ubrabio) and the national union of household agriculture and solidarity-based economy (Unicafes) had told Fastmarkets Agriculture at the end of February that the sector believed B15 could be reached by March 2024.

The industry greatly expected the announcement as it means higher domestic demand for biodiesel and upstream products, particularly soy oil, which represents about 70% of the feedstock used to produce biodiesel in Brazil.

Brazil’s biodiesel blending mandate has reached a maximum of B13 and was first scheduled to reach B15 in March 2023.

However, the mandate was reduced to B10 in 2021 as the government attempted to control domestic inflation and the blending mandate has since remained at that level.

The impact on demand for soy oil

According to estimates that Abiove shared with Fastmarkets at the beginning of the year, the mandated increase to B12 will lift Brazil’s soy oil demand from the biodiesel sector by about 800,000 tonnes annually.

Brazil’s 2022-23 soybean crush is estimated at 52.7 million tonnes according to the country’s food agency Conab’s latest update, with soy oil and soy meal output pegged at 40.4 million tonnes and 10.8 million tonnes, respectively.

That number might be revised downwards in Conab’s April update as the current estimates still considered a mandated increase to B15 in March.

That said, Brazil’s soy oil export program has been extremely robust since the beginning of the marketing year, and any possible downgrade in Conab’s domestic consumption figures may be offset or more than offset by higher export numbers.

What to read next
Crude palm oil (CPO) and soyoil futures on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) extended gains on Thursday March 12, as it continued to track strength in related vegoils and energy markets. The highs in CPO reached earlier in the day eased off by the day’s close.
The global tungsten market in 2026 is marked by extreme volatility driven by geopolitical tensions, trade disputes, and resource nationalism, especially between China and the US. These dynamics have caused significant supply disruptions and price surges across tungsten products.
In the past year, trade policy has and continues to fuel change and dynamics in the North American steel market. Meanwhile, inflation has remained at or above 2.7% while the Fed Fund rate hovers around 2.64. The consumer continues to bear a growing burden to keep the economy from stalling, as finished goods markets search for their own nadir, stability and potential growth paths.
Soybean oil prices rose to 67.3 cents, driven by Middle East disruptions and strong biofuel margins. Fastmarkets predicts continued price strength amid geopolitical risks.
US animal fats and oils markets have moved higher in recent weeks alongside gains in soybean oil futures and diesel values, with improving renewable diesel and biodiesel economics driving stronger demand for feedstocks.
The recent wave of anti-dumping measures approved in Brazil has been met with some concern in China — the country most affected by the Brazilian government’s decisions in this case — but despite the negative impact, Chinese participants see the moves as just another phase of doing business.